News

Iran escalation: Quick thoughts on markets

Posted on: Mar 02 2026

Key takeaways:

  • Markets are likely to open the week with risk-off, with declines led by airlines, cyclicals and trade-exposed names, while energy, defense and “strategic” sectors may be relatively steadier.

  • Oil upside may be stickier than typical headline spikes because markets are pricing both barrels and the cost of moving barrels (insurance, rerouting, war-risk premia) given the entire Middle East region is engulfed in the conflict.

  • Safe havens should re-price, led by gold and typically JPY/CHF, while Treasuries may be more mixed if inflation risks dominate.

Asia open: risk-off first, then differentiate

  • Markets are likely to open the week with a risk-off tone, with pressure most visible in airlines, cyclicals and trade-exposed sectors.

  • Energy, mining and defense/security exposures may show relative resilience as risk premia rise and security spending expectations build.

  • Traditional defensives (utilities, consumer staples, healthcare) may hold up better than the broader market, but they are not immune if the selloff is driven by higher oil prices and inflation concerns.

  • Asia and EM face a dual shock: higher oil prices (often an inflation/tax effect) plus a broader pullback in risk appetite.

Oil: upside more likely to be sticky

  • Oil prices are likely to gap higher, and the move may not fade quickly because the market is not only pricing barrels, but also the cost of moving barrels.

  • Even without a full shutdown, higher war-risk premia, rerouting and insurance repricing can keep crude and freight costs elevated.

  • With the wider Gulf region impacted, unwinding this geopolitical risk premium may take time given the region’s central role in global energy supply.

  • There is also an incentive for Iran to keep the oil risk premium elevated as a form of economic pressure, because energy is one of the fastest transmission channels into global inflation and sentiment.

What sustained higher oil means for inflation and the Fed path

  • If higher oil prices persist, it raises the risk of stickier headline inflation and can slow the pace at which inflation prints improve.

  • That does not automatically mean policy tightening, but it can make the Fed more cautious about cutting quickly, as energy-driven inflation can spill into expectations and broader pricing behaviour over time.

  • Net: a higher bar for a clean “dovish pivot” if oil stays bid.

Sector lens: who typically benefits vs. who feels the pain

  • Relative beneficiaries

    • Energy and select mining exposures (commodity support, cash-flow sensitivity to prices)

    • Defense/security and critical infrastructure enablers (including counter-drone / protective systems)

  • Most impacted

    • Airlines, airports, travel & leisure (fuel and demand shock)

    • Shipping/logistics and global trade-exposed names (war-risk insurance, rerouting, delays)

    • Oil-sensitive importers across Asia/EM (margin squeeze + weaker consumer spending power)

Gold and silver: hedges can work together

  • Gold tends to do well when investors want an asset less dependent on earnings visibility, supply chains, or any single region’s political risk.

  • It can also serve as a policy-plus-inflation hedge when energy risks complicate the macro path—creating “double support” for gold and, to a degree, other precious metals.

  • Silver can see bigger upside in a risk-off bid because it typically carries more beta than gold: it can rally harder when hedging demand rises, but it is usually more volatile.

  • Safe-haven demand can lift both the US dollar and gold—it’s not either/or. In geopolitical shocks, gold can trade as “insurance” even if the dollar is firm.

  • JPY and CHF: typically perform well in risk-off episodes due to repatriation flows, strong external balances and safe-haven positioning.

  • US Treasuries: may be less straightforward than in a classic growth scare. If markets treat this primarily as an inflation/energy shock, yields can wobble higher even as equities fall (i.e., bonds don’t hedge as cleanly). If the shock morphs into a growth scare, Treasuries can still catch a bid.

Scenarios from here

  • Best case

    • Rapid de-escalation and limited disruption to flows

    • Equities can stabilise and retrace, but oil may still hold above pre-event levels as insurance and security costs take time to normalise

  • Worst case

    • If Iran feels backed into a corner, escalation may become more likely and less predictable

    • Meaningful disruption around key shipping lanes; oil and freight/insurance costs rise further

    • Risk-off deepens and inflation risks become more persistent, reducing central banks’ flexibility and extending volatility globally

Bigger picture: fundamentals return, but the regime has changed

  • Once volatility settles, markets typically go back to earnings, cash flows and fundamentals.

  • But this episode is another reminder that the global economy is fragmenting, and “strategic sectors” matter more in portfolio construction.

  • Gold, defense and other security-linked enablers are increasingly becoming core building blocks as geopolitical risk becomes more frequent rather than exceptional.

  • In that environment, active risk management matters, because leadership can rotate quickly as the map changes.

 

Disclaimer: FX and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 61% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading FX and CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how FX and CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results. The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options..
Charu ChananaChief Investment StrategistSaxo Markets
Topics: Equities Macro Central Banks GDP Macro FX USD XAUUSD Gold Commodities Theme - Precious metals Europe European Union (EU) Germany Germany Mid-cap 250 Germany Tech 30 Germany 40 Japan Japan 225 China Hong Kong 50
That didn't take long: Trump increases global tariff to 15% from 10%

Posted on: Feb 22 2026

Trump is raising the tariff he just announced yesterday from 10% to 15%.

He announced on Truth Social:

Based on a thorough, detailed, and complete review of the ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American decision on Tariffs issued yesterday, after MANY months of contemplation, by the United States Supreme Court, please let this statement serve to represent that I, as President of the United States of America, will be, effective immediately, raising the 10% Worldwide Tariff on Countries, many of which have been “ripping” the U.S. off for decades, without retribution (until I came along!), to the fully allowed, and legally tested, 15% level. During the next short number of months, the Trump Administration will determine and issue the new and legally permissible Tariffs, which will continue our extraordinarily successful process of Making America Great Again - GREATER THAN EVER BEFORE!!! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD J. TRUMP

Now this really looks like amateur hour as they had many months to study the possibility that tariffs would be blocked. This isn't exactly 4D chess and makes a mockery of anyone trying to plan and do business.

All that said, this basically takes the power of tariffs away from Trump, or at least the short-term whims that he likes to negotiate with. Now that it's at 15%, he can't get angry about a TV add or something a foreign politician says and hit them with tariffs.

The Section 122 tariffs he's using here also expire in 150 days.

Also, in contrast to what he said, the executive order from yesterday said the tariffs weren't in effect until Feb 24 so there is a short window here for importers. I think that's going to somewhat skew imports for a few things, though it might not leave too big of a ripple in the aggregate data for February.

That executive order also exempts USMCA (which was already largely, though not completely) tariff free. Here is the full text of the exemptions:

(a) certain critical minerals;(b) metals used in currency and bullion;(c) energy and energy products;(d) natural resources and fertilizers that cannot be grown, mined, or otherwise produced in the United States or grown, mined, or otherwise produced in sufficient quantities to meet domestic demand;(e) certain agricultural products, including beef, tomatoes, and oranges;(f) pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients;(g) certain electronics;(h) passenger vehicles, certain light trucks, certain medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, buses, and certain parts of passenger vehicles, light trucks, medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, and buses;(i) certain aerospace products;(j) information materials, donations, and accompanied baggage;(k) all articles and parts of articles currently or that later become subject to additional import restrictions imposed pursuant to section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1862) (section 232);(l) articles that are entered free of duty as a good of Canada or Mexico under the terms of general note 11 to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), including any treatment set forth in subchapter XXIII of chapter 98 and subchapter XXII of chapter 99 of the HTSUS, as related to the Agreement between the United States of America, United Mexican States, and Canada; and(m) textile and apparel articles that are entered free of duty as a good of Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, or Nicaragua under the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement.

This article was written by Adam Button at investinglive.com.